patching...
Update: Click here to get the latest news from Buffalo Grove Patch delivered to your inbox every morning! It's FREE! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Sherman Alleges Civil Rights Violations, Sues Buffalo Grove

Atheist Rob Sherman sued Buffalo Grove, claiming it violates the Constitution by promoting religion-based events.

 

Rob Sherman is suing Buffalo Grove, which he alleges violated his civil rights by promoting religious events in its electronic newsletter.

The lawsuit, which was filed Wednesday, references an upcoming pig roast at Hope Lutheran Church in Long Grove. The event, which will also include children’s activities and live music, was posted in the Aug. 18 edition of Village E-News. The newsletter is sent by email to those who register on the village’s website.

On the sign-up page, Village E-News is described as “A weekly email highlighting Village Board action items, community events, development initiatives, and more.”

Sherman, a vocal atheist who lives in Buffalo Grove, said in the lawsuit that he “objects to his taxpayer funds and property being used to help a church to sell tickets to an event that is or may be a church fund-raiser, a church marketing event, or both, because promoting such an event is not a public purpose for the use of [his] taxpayer resources.”

The lawsuit goes on to say the village has used the electronic newsletter, bi-monthly Village News publication and outdoor message board near Village Hall to promote other religious-related events.

Sherman said the civil rights violations caused him “emotional distress” and seeks $100,000 in damages, reimbursement for his legal expenses and assurance the village will cease promoting events with ties to religous organizations.

Also named in the suit, in their “official capacity only,” are Village President Jeff Braiman, Village Manager Dane Bragg and Village Clerk Janet Sirabian.

“We think it’s a baseless lawsuit,” Braiman said. “We will defend it in court and not in the media.”

Sirabian declined to comment on the suit. Bragg deferred comment to village attorney William Raysa, who said he has turned the matter over to the Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency. The agency will appoint a lawyer to represent the village, he said.

Related Topics: Civil Rights, Lawsuit, and Rob Sherman
Do you think the village should include religious-related events in its newsletter? Tell us in the comments.

Ron Paglia

5:18 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Mr. Sherman must have the insides of bubble gum to claim his "emotional distress" is worth $100.000.00. I will happily pay the hundreds of dollars that actually goes to the Village from his taxes if he would just go away and not comeback! This guy is a publicity hound from the word Kvetch!

Reply

Dave Dybas

6:52 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Sherman is looking for the Village to pay damages...I'm curious just what Mr. Sherman does for a living ? Does he live on monies that he's has received from these frivolous law suits? Just Curious.

Reply

M. Sanford

7:25 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

Hey Sherman Thanks for letting My Famil knowy about the pig roast . Looks like a nice time .

Reply

Dr. Michael Glaskin-Clay

8:37 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

"Hey, you forgot to let us know how you feel — please enter a comment." My response might result in another lawsuit.

Reply

Richard Reder

9:18 pm on Friday, August 26, 2011

I have ''emotional distress'' caused by Mr. Sherman and that goofy truck he drives
around in. I plan to file a lawsuit after I get back from the pig roast! God Bless America!

Reply

Jeanne S

7:02 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

Can Mr Sherman be sued for being a complete moron?

Reply

Burt

8:23 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

ys everyone should file a lawsuit against Sherman

Reply

Charles

9:06 am on Saturday, August 27, 2011

Wow. It's a shame that he can't take all his wasted energy and put it towards something meaningful like fighting poverty or hunger, helping children in foster care or battered women living in shelters, donating toys to children with terminal diseases, helping homeless pets be adopted inseat of euthanized, visiting lonely elderly people in nursing homs.

Reply

John

1:30 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

I want to countersue Mr Sherman for causing me - a fellow taxpayer in Mr Sherman's village - enough "emotional distress" to want to write this comment! Where do I start - and does anyone want to join-in against this putz?
I think my "emotional distress" could be worth about $100,000 here.
That's good enough to cover me from working hard at a real job, and having time to sit around [getting "distressed"] while thinking-up useless frivolous lawsuits against nice towns and it's residents. Eh?
Mr Sherman - I am not overtly religious nor an atheist - but whatever our belief system is... If you don't like to promote peaceful events (religious or not) where the whole community is invited to partake & enjoy... then PLEASE do us the favor of putting a "FOR SALE" sign in your front yard, ok?
Your fellow taxpayer neighbors don't need you stealing from the community chest for personal gain.

Reply

Bob Ibach

2:30 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

Better idea....let's run this clown out of the area the old cowboy way....soon.

Reply

Bob Ibach

2:34 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

I'd be curious to find out just how many suits over the years this guy has won, and what is the monetary amount? Might be interesting. And while on the topic of suits, well, judging from Squrimin Sherman's pic, he could use an update suit to wear. Looks like he is stuck in the 1970s. He gives bland a new meaning. Looks kinda like a leisure suit in an odd way.

Reply

Rick Edwards

8:45 pm on Saturday, August 27, 2011

The Village E-News has a clear, concise, AND 100% transparent Disclaimer that provides FULL DISCLOSURE of the contents of the E-News.

The words "and more" are broad enough for any competent attorney appointed to defend the village against this egrrgiously frivolous lawsuit by Rob Sherman.

The village is NOT endorsing any religion when its E-News carries an announcement advertising an upcoming pig roast at Hope Lutheran Church in Long Grove (which also included information on children’s activities and live music).

Mr Sherman is equally free to submit an announcement about his favorite atheist cult's activity which the village is free to select or reject for publication.

Illinois does need a statute that provides Illinois governmental units who prevail in frivolous lawsuits like this one.

Reply

Tom

4:50 pm on Monday, August 29, 2011

Thanks goodness someone has the convictions of Mr. Sherman to stand up to this blatant disregard to the laws of this great country and to the constitution to which we all subscribe.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John

12:46 am on Tuesday, August 30, 2011

If your comment is inferring to "separation of church and State" again, you should re-read your history books and understand *why* the Constitution was devised in the first place.

Mr Sherman's law suit is clearly just an ideological front used to extort an easy living - to the tune of $100,000 in so-called "emotional distress" - out of otherwise very good community intentions.

Marie Schmidt

3:11 am on Sunday, September 4, 2011

Mr. Sherman you claim to defend the constitution but you obviously don't understand it. The "Separation of church and State" was not to protect the public from religion but to gurantee there right to practice there religion of there choice without interference from the government (the reason our fore fathers came to this country)
By printing the about the Pork Roast at the Lutheran Church was letting community know of an up coming event no one said it was manditory to attend the public had a choice to attend or not as did you. Marie

Reply

Abigail

7:17 pm on Sunday, September 4, 2011

I hope the lady who creates the e-news doesn't get into trouble for this. Community events are just that--community events. Last I heard, the churches and synagogues around BG are part of the "community."

Oh, and it's time to use a more current photo of Mr. Sherman. The one used has to be a minimum of 20 years old.

Reply

Ellie

9:13 pm on Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Sherman can't win. I Think the ACLJ* has argued cases like this before. The BG E-News is considered a "public forum." If the village only rejected the posting of CHURCH community activities, the BG village would be guilty of "viewpoint discrimination." *American Center for Law and Justice

Reply

new2020

10:52 pm on Thursday, May 16, 2013

Browse Leather, Epi Leather, Canvas & Monogram Bags at http://pinterest.com/louisvuittonlv/. Louis Vuitton Spring Summer 2013 Show your fashion style now!

Reply

Leave a comment