.
Feedback

Stevenson School Board Winners, Supporters Celebrate Success

The United 4 Stevenson slate members praised and thanked the community Tuesday night following their victory at the polls.

After , the incumbent slate triumphed in the Stevenson School Board election.

Terry Moons, Bruce Lubin, Merv Roberts and David Weisberg each prevailed by about a two-thirds margin over challengers , and .

With all , Weisberg led the way with 4,818 votes. He was followed by Moons (4,626), Lubin (4,611), Roberts (4,500), Brady (2,595), Powell (2,573) and Cardella (2,309).

Dozens of supporters of the winning candidates, who campaigned together under the name "United 4 Stevenson," gathered at Long Grove Café Tuesday night to track election results while celebrating with food and drink.

“We did this (campaign) with a passion,” Moons told supporters after the race results were announced. “I wanted to retire, but didn’t want 25 years to be taken apart. I couldn’t let it happen.”

“I’m proud of everyone here,” Lubin said. “I thank everyone for what they did.”

“It’s the community that did this,” Roberts said. “This victory is a victory of the community, by the community, for the community.” He then told all supporters to give themselves a standing ovation.

Before Weisberg addressed the crowd, supporters chanted “Dave! Dave! Dave!”
Weisberg thanked his wife, Stevenson's teachers and his campaign mates for their work. “[Moons, Lubin and Weisberg] did the heavy lifting in this campaign. We need to protect the house they built," he said.

“Thirteen weeks ago, we came face-to-face with a difficult situation,” said Lori Lyman, a Stevenson School Board member who coordinated the United 4 Stevenson campaign. “We took on the noble task of defending public education ... We came together to protect what we invested in.”

Buffalo Grove Village President Elliott Hartstein, who previously served on the Stevenson School Board for eight years, was among the supporters in Tuesday night's crowd.

“This race was decisive,” he said. “People are pleased with Stevenson, and we have a group dedicated to success for every student. The caliber of the faculty is second to none.”

He was joined at the gathering by community members who backed the United 4 Stevenson team.

“A lot of work went into this campaign,” Matt McNamara, the webmaster for the United 4 Stevenson slate, said. “A lot of people put a lot of time and effort into this.”

“The results speak for themselves. We have one of the best high schools in the country," supporter Beth Butler said.

Some noted that campaign supporters came from diverse backgrounds.

“In this room, you see people from across the political spectrum. Education transcends politics,” Joel Finfer said.

Stevenson students also attended to show their support.

“I’m here to support United 4 Stevenson because I like the way things are going at our school,” said Megan Vanderah, who showed her support by wearing a campaign banner.

“I volunteered with the campaign because the future of Stevenson is important to me,” Stevenson senior Paul Grobman said. “It was necessary for me to get involved.”

Community involvement was instrumental to the group's success, Lyman said.

After announcing United 4 Stevenson’s win, Lyman shared with the audience the campaign by the numbers. “Supporters for United 4 Stevenson hosted 20 coffees, wrote over 50 , displayed more than 1,300 signs and banners, knocked on over 4,000 doors, made over 6,000 phone calls, and mailed over 40,000 brochures,” she said. "We made about $50,000, and spent about $50,000."

“We really pushed to get the vote out," she said.

Reached by phone Tuesday night, Powell said, “We brought things to light, and we will work through these issues.”

“I hope the board recognizes the community’s concerns, and will address those concerns,” Kim said.

“We will support [United 4 Stevenson] in all of the issues," Cardella said.

Abigail April 6, 2011 at 01:34 pm
A lot of people--me included--were put off by the comments being made in letters to editors about "extremist thinking" and "fundamentalists." Anytime a group wants to make sure they get what they want they use those terms.
As for the comment by Moons, “I wanted to retire, but didn’t want 25 years to be taken apart. I couldn’t let it happen.” Come on, what do you think would have been taken apart here? You won the race, you can stop repeating the scare tactics now.
Abigail April 6, 2011 at 04:55 pm
What is your argument against intelligent design being taught in science? You are insisting that your children be taught your line of thinking, but not allowing allow them to be taught both sides of the issue so they can make their own decisions is disingenuous. I would prefer that my children be taught both sides so they aren’t being programmed according to what a particular school board feels they need to know.
Maybe you feel your child doesn’t have the mental capacity to make an informed decision. But more harm comes to your child from him or her not being provided with the tools they need to succeed in life by keeping them in a narrow-minded existence, much the same as what you accuse others of doing. This was not a good day for democracy--but it was for fear-mongering, innuendo, and distortions on the part of the winners.
Pastafarian April 6, 2011 at 05:14 pm
Intelligent Design isn't science. What experiments have ever been performed and published in a peer-reviewed journal that validate the literal interpretation of Genesis? Teach it in philosophy if you wish, but not science.
And there are more than "both" sides. What about the Hindu, Buddhist and Aztec creation stories? And let's not forget Scientology. You'd be OK with your kids' science teachers using valuable class time teaching them about Xenu, who 75,00,000 years ago headed the Galactic Federation of 76 planets and sent their frozen souls to Earth to start the human race, right? And it appears you don't disagree with me that Charlie Cardella is a liar.
ConsiderThis April 6, 2011 at 06:30 pm
We thought the anger and name-calling might subside now. (?)
Bill April 6, 2011 at 10:29 pm
Abigail.
Have you ever considered that the 1-2-5 people lost because...well...most people disagree with them? You're not giving citizens enough credit. Mud was thrown on both sides, and people voted according to their judgment.
ed April 7, 2011 at 02:29 pm
Abigail, science class is not debate class. There aren't "both sides" of the evolution issue -- evolutionary theory is science, "intelligent design" is superstition.
Intelligent design, or creationism, can be discussed in a class where other religious myths are discussed -- Greek and Roman gods, Judaism, Christianity, Scientology, whatever. It's all superstition and mythology.
Elizabeth April 7, 2011 at 06:14 pm
Why should intelligent design not be taught in the science classroom at Stevenson? Quite simply, an amazing document called The United States Constitution, which governs this free country . As long as the interpretation of The Constitution is a separation of church and state and public schools accept tax payers' money, intelligent design does not belong in the classroom. That is the reason why many private religious school were founded. In a private school, where no tax payers' money is accepted, religious ideas are freely taught.
DeAnn Glover April 7, 2011 at 06:38 pm
I think creationism or intelligent design is more suited to a college philosophy or world religion class. There young people can hear both sides of the argument and make their own decisions.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Buffalo Grove Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Penny Novy June 18, 2013 at 09:01 am
I saw a post about requesting a new toter 2-3 weeks ago and called Waste Management right away toRead More get my name on the list. They told me the new 35-gallon one would be delivered the week of 6/24. When I looked outside this morning upon hearing a truck, I saw that they took my old one and replaced it with the 35-gallon toter. (Today is my trash day.) It may take time for the delivery to occur since it takes longer than when they pickup your trash and it's someone with a different vehicle doing it. The only problem I have with WM is they didn't take the old wicker lawn chair I left out for the trash.
Alan Danenberg June 18, 2013 at 12:06 pm
While I understand the intended benefits of these new toters (increased efficiencies by WM, whichRead More should help keep residents' costs down), there has been an unintended consequence to this. As you walk around the neighborhood, you now see the majority of homes having to leave the toters OUTSIDE, even for those who were successful in getting the smaller ones delivered. How many homes now have their garbage sitting alongside their garages, or even out on their driveways, all the time? Not exactly eye-appeal. I was able to fit mine into the garage, barely, next to my recycle toter, but now I can't open the back door of my car when its in the garage. I only hope that the raccoons don't figure out how to lift the lids!
Kolleen Cherry June 16, 2013 at 09:17 am
Sale starts at 10AM!
Cristel Mohrman (Editor) June 16, 2013 at 10:59 am
Thanks for posting! You can also add this to our regional garage sale map for added exposure!Read More http://buffalogrove.patch.com/groups/week-ahead/p/garage-yard-and-estate-sales-in-buffalo-grove-listed-here_08f0c75e
Cristel Mohrman (Editor) June 10, 2013 at 10:02 am
What a great story! Thanks for sharing your winnings with this man and for sharing your story onRead More Patch!