Keep Religion Out of Science Class

I am deeply troubled that candidates Powell, Brady, and Cardella, in denying that they want to teach intelligent design, state on the February 22 news page of their website that they “seek a common ground approach that exposes students to both the strengths and weaknesses of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theories.” In fact, scientists consider the evidence for evolution in the fossil record to be overwhelming. To suggest, in a science curriculum, that evolution is not the most accurate and comprehensive explanation for the diversity of life is a blatant attempt to insert a particular religious viewpoint into the science curriculum.

The tensions between deeply held religious beliefs and science are not new. There are a variety of resolutions, many of which do not conflict with evolution. But, as matters of faith, reflecting diverse spiritual views, their consideration does not belong in a science curriculum.

For one of the top US high schools to adopt a curriculum which intentionally blurs the distinction between science and religion, would, in my opinion, be an embarassment for the district, and for the nation. Mr. Brady states on his website that, “This campaign isn’t about sexual orientation or teaching alternate theories of evolution,” which he characterizes as “red herrings.” This is not a red herring. Rather, it is vitally important that we recognize it for what it is: an assault on science and an attempt to circumvent the separation of church and state in public education.

Thank you for consideration.

Rosanne Fitko

Lincolnshire