This is never a good time for candidates. Accusations, campaigns, major statements and, for one candidate, chicken soup.
Having announced his candidacy a few months ago, Chicken Little, along with FIDO have been finding themselves on the outside looking in. "It's amazing how much coverage my opponents, Sid Mathias and Carol Sente, have received," Little said. "And they're not even addressing the issues."
So what's the problem? "It's turned into to one smear after another," Little said. "In fact," he clucked, "the biggest issue in the campaign seems to be former Buffalo Grove trustee Lisa Stone."
So how, I asked, does Stone become an issue? "Because she claimed to be in the Mathias camp and then Mathias came out and said nope, she wasn't".
So this is an issue of great significance for a state representative? Not really. as Little pointed out, the alignment, or perceived alignment, depending on to whom you speak, or which online media comments you read, is the issue. Mathias added fuel to the fire by allegedly not addressing the issue at a campaign Town Hall meeting, which really bothered people.
So once again a Lisa Stone-fueled snowball began rolling. But is it relevant at this time? If she wants to support Mathias, that's her business. If he wants to align himself with her efforts, that's his business.
What's lost is the reason Sente and Mathias are running -- not to please Lisa Stone -- but to represent the people of the newly drawn 59th district and take their views to Springfield.
Remember Springfield? It's the state capital and also the name of the Simpson's hometown. The two parallel each other. It seems that the state is being led by Homer or Ed Flanders or even Apu.
So while representatives from around the state ponder ways to improve the state fledgling credit rating, diminishing state pension program and a crumbling infrastructure -- residents of the 59th are hearing about Lisa Stone's support of Mathias.
"So who cares," Little asked. A fair number of people who like to post on on-line media sites. "They address the issues?" Little said.
Little may be on to something. There hasn't been much debate about the issues. Only who supports whom. I don't really care who Lisa Stone supports. In fact, I don't really care who anyone supports.
What I want is to know where the candidates stand. Period.
"So what do they do?" Little asked.
Send out more junk mail. You've seen them, the ones with superimposed pictures of opponents with cash hanging out their pockets or hiding behind a mask.
"Sounds like a disservice to the voters," Little said. "You'd think they would just simply state their positions and ideas."
You would, indeed. Instead we're more infatuated about who supports whom.
"So what's the answer," Little asked.
I'm not sure. The state has about as much stability as the Bears offensive line, and the candidates seem to have their heads in the sand.
"Well," said Little, "my position is clear on one thing."
And that is?
"There won't be a chicken in every pot."
True. They'll all be in Springfield.
Mark Bushey
12:45 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
I agree the Lisa Stone issue got out of hand, and I am one of those that was pushing Mathias to respond to her claims. However, the issue was if he supported the antics that disrupt our government. Why would we want someone in Springfield that supports anyone that is as accusatory, full of it, and disruptive at any level of government?
I really would not hope the race would come down to the support of one person. I believe Mathias needed to come out and say what he did so him and Sente could go back and focus on the issues. In the end, I was more disappointed with Sente's staff for sending out flyers that showed him aligned with Stone. The few people on the Patch making comments about how it's bad for his race is one thing. His opponent actually making it an issue by using his so called "alliance" is another.
Grand High Exhalted Mystic Ruler over all Racoondom
2:09 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
Politics as usual ... don't commit to anything ... smear the other candidate ... bring up a loser trustee as an issue and avoid all the real issues ... glad I don't live in that district!
RELENTLESSCRITIC
4:53 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
It only became an issue because Mathias has avoided it since all the trouble started right after Stone was elected. Since he originally endorsed her (read: recommended that people vote for her), he had some influence in how the election played out. I am in no way blaming him for Stone's ineptitude and lousy behavior as a Trustee, or more recently as whatever kind of an activist she feels like calling herself on any given day. However, when she started coming off the rails, the least he could have done was try to stop her (since his professional reputation was on the line) and then denounce her actions publicly. For many people, his silence equaled tacit endorsement of her behaviors and causes, and the longer he avoided clarifying his position, the worse he looked. I felt the need to call him out publicly to clarify, once and for all, where he stood.
I am sure that many of the 9000 voters who supported Stone's recall were interested to know where he stood because I don't think they would have been very pleased if he had still been supportive of someone who created so much chaos and disruption and wasted so much of their tax dollars on non-causes. He's made his position clear and it is now put to rest, but it needed to happen.
Now let's focus on the real issues and let the fun begin!