patching...
Update: Click here to get the latest news from Buffalo Grove Patch delivered to your inbox every morning! It's FREE! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

POLL: Downtown Buffalo Grove: Yay or Nay?

Does Buffalo Grove need a downtown?

 

A developer’s proposal to build a downtown near the center of the village sparked strong emotions over the summer, ranging from excitement to high concern. 

The plan calls for the construction of commercial buildings, homes, parks and other public gathering spaces on 65 acres that are now home to Buffalo Grove’s municipal campus and the Buffalo Grove Golf Course.

“If this can come to fruition, I think this is a fabulous opportunity for the community,” Trustee Jeff Berman said, after hearing developer Charles Malk outline his proposal in August.

Not everyone is as optimistic.

In early October, concerned residents formed “Save Buffalo Grove,” a grassroots group that is protesting the plan and considering pursuing the recall of some elected officials.

Citizens have engaged in debate over the topic on Patch stories, where they’ve posted hundreds of comments expressing their diverging opinions.

What do you think about the proposal? Take our poll, or join the conversation by posting a comment or creating a post in Local Voices.

  • What do you think about the Downtown Buffalo Grove Proposal?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • I love it. Let's start building!
        35 (22%)
    • No way. This would be a mistake.
        98 (62%)
    • I'm still undecided.
        23 (14%)
    Total votes: 156
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Downtown Buffalo Grove

Congregation Beth Judea

8:16 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I'm slightly confused on this idea, wasn't the purpose of Towncenter a downtown area for Buffalo Grove? As a resident if I go there twice a year it's a lot. There are NO Stores I would shop at, possible one restaurant I would eat at, and one movie theater, that is so dirty inside you stick to the floor, that might possibly be closed in a few months. If I am correct the condos behind the center only one of the two buildings proposed is constructed. Before we start tearing down our beautiful municipal complex, to build a new town center, that might again be half empty, and go unused, let's improve what we do have, and get it up and running to what it was intended for. Spending money on a hope and a dream, is not really a sound idea, in these tough financial times. Then we would need new property to build a new municipal campus, when the one we have is perfectly fine.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan Glatt

10:28 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I agree with Audrey! Let's re-vamp the original towncenter that was supposed to be Buffalo Grove downtown area!

Comment_arrow

Danette Hayes

1:33 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I agree with Audry and Susan and others. Let's teardown the existing Town Center and do it right this time as opposed to destroying what little green space we have left. Incorporating the village green into a new space as it was originally intended would provide "park like" settings but it's not so much the setting as it is the type of stores and restaurants that will be brought to Buffalo Grove. Just taking over new land isn't necessarily a ticket for success if we can't get something new and worth visiting in any space you build. BG offers subpar shopping and the restaurant choice is limited to mostly fast food. Spending millions isn't going to matter if we can't introduce the public to spectacular, unique shopping and dining opportunities. So I vote YES for a downtown but NO on the site. Tear down the existing Town Center and do it right this time.

Comment_arrow

Diane

3:37 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I'd also like to point out that once someone gets on the board, it's nearly impossible to get people to vote them off. I admit to apathy but I think a large number of people on the village board have been there a long time including the village president and Mr. Berman, both of whom think this is a wonderful idea. Mr Braiman says he wants to do whats best for us, so give us a chance to vote on it and tell them what we think. I don't know one single neighbor who thinks this is a good idea.

Comment_arrow

Buffalo Grove Theater

5:28 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Audrey,
I do agree that the Towncenter needs to be fixed up and that the new downtown would be a great mistake. I just thought I would interject though because it is obvious to me that you have not been there in a while. There is a new management company in there now and they are starting to rent space out. As for the movie theater we took it over almost 4 years ago and have cleaned the place up and made it into a first-run movie theater. This means that we show new movies the day they come out and we have made it a nice place for the community. WE ARE NOT closing in a few months we are doing what all small theaters are doing and that is a fundraiser to change to digital projection which needs to be done before the end of 2013. It will be nice to see if the Town of BG supports the theater like other towns communities have done.

Comment_arrow

eulogio minon

3:22 pm on Sunday, December 23, 2012

I agree. Let us improve, revamp what we have now and save money, save the golf course which I and many residents enjoy.

Comment_arrow

Diane

9:01 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

They couldn't have picked a worse place to put it. It's on Lake Cook Road near Buffalo Grove Road. Can you think of anywhere in the village where traffic is worse?

chris wright

9:15 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Before I can decide pro/ con need to see the final details of what they want to build. Since the golf course isn't self supporting it's clear something needs to be done with that land. Will wait for the facts before forming an opinion.

Reply

Paul Killick

9:19 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

How many stores do we really need? Shopping should NOT be viewed as entertainment or recreation. It's a mall, not a "town center". Don't let anyone tell you different.... People want to live in BG for the parks and green space, not because there is a Starbucks in middle of a mall where a beautiful piece of open space used to exist... If it happens we'll call it Towncenter v2.0.....sad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

cheri kushner

1:43 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

totally agree with you. i have heard that the developer is the guy who did deerfield. IF that is true, goes ask the business people who had to deal with him what THEY think.

Angie Murrman Carlson

9:44 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Most successful Village downtowns are located near a rail system.....don't you think this would be better location to bring business/revenue to the area??? Lake Cook rd/Buffalo Grove Rd is too congested as it is!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy Klein

12:19 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Angie, I agree and they're also visible to cars on major thoroughfares passing through the town.

At a recent board meeting CMAP made some recommendations for future growth and development and they kept stressing that we should highlight the area around the train station. Of course the board had nothing to say to those recommendations. But when the developer came to discuss this plan, oh how they gushed and fawned over it and him. It was pathetic.

This is not the economy to attempt this and to choose a parcel of land tucked away like this, makes no sense. Not to mention the developer kept talking about upscale stores. Gee, that sounds familiar, doesn't it? Anyone around for the planning of the town center will know exactly what I'm getting at.

Some BG boards have made it sound like we're a mini-Glencoe and should aspire to upscale this and that except when they want a water park "just like Wheeling". That's been part of our problem - we don't know who we want to be here.

Planning a bunch of upscale stores in a town with a ton of empty storefronts and too many home foreclosures makes you wonder what these jokers are thinking. Many of us are struggling to stay here given our property taxes and can't afford to support mainstream stores, let alone upscale stores.

Wake up board members!!!

Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

1:03 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Sandy,
You are so right.
The reason the CMAP recommendations drew the cricket response from the Board is because it flies in the face of of their eden of a "downtown."
Buffalo Grove is full of empty store fronts and a total lack of ability to develop some of our prime retail property along Milwaukee. When this is brought up, the Board cries the "economy" but the "economy" doesn't seem to be relevant to their new downtown concept.
The hypocrisy of the Board is overwhelming. When you bring up the disaster that is called the Town Center, they say "we have no control" even though the Board at the time did. If you bring up the empty store fronts, they say "the economy" which apparently seems not to be of concern when it comes to their newly created darling development. The whole Board seems to be chiding us about our lack of vision when in fact is it exactly what they lack, especially when it comes to listening to the vast and deep concerns so many have expressed.
To date, not one, NOT ONE, trustee has expressed any misgivings/concerns /worries about this concept. As a group they all seem to be totally stone deaf to the many legitimate concerns expressed. The folly goes on and we are now being treated to a sales campaign on the website.

Comment_arrow

Anne Kritzmire

5:12 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I agree that near the train makes much more sense. It provides natural foot and car traffic twice a day M- F. In addition, as many have stated, bg and lg already have multiple retail locations that are suffering; i cant think of a single retail area that hasnt got at least one vacancy. It is hard to understand where demand for more would come from.

Bob

10:18 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Who is going to pay for this to happen...? the taxpayers, or the businesses that are not there yet. As it is, Taxes in BG are very high and my salary is very low.With the many increases in the utilities bills, food prices, etc, my salary to pay for this project does not meet the expectations for this to happen. if you plan on not listing to the people who live in BG area, and plan on constructing the Town Center any way, do it in small increments and get the prospective business to commit, and then lets see where it goes from there

Reply

Jilly

10:31 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

We are so against this proposal that we are down right angry that they would even consider this. This is a classic case of let's pave paradise and put up a parking lot. We've been reading about this proposal and besides killing more green space, we don't want MORE traffic in an already impossible area to pass through any time near or around rush hour. Another negative is that we have so many vacant storefronts as it is. Let's try to get the existing storefronts occupied. The building of more housing will increase the burden on all our services and schools as well. We no longer have children in school but wouldn't smaller class sizes be preferable? Stop this insane proposal before it could possibly happen. Leave BG the way it is and let it continue to be the beautiful town that attracted residents to BG to begin with.

Reply
Comment_arrow

cheri kushner

1:53 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

once again i have to agree with you. i also like the idea of tearing down town center and using that to bring in business. oh wait, we tried that before and that didn't work either. we have so many empty strip malls. i don't know why we can't get businesses in bg to be profitable but the fact is we can't. stop spending our taxes until you figure out HOW to run a productive township. going by prior history the stores will be up and ready and the village will still be arguing for an additional 3 years about what the signs can look like. oy gee, just forget the whole thing.

Tim Frillman

11:09 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think you people are all crazy! In order for buffalo grove to be competitive with towns such as palatine, Arlington Heights WE NEED A REAL DOWN TOWN..... if you want to bring in revenue and create jobs making nice new facilities a downtown attraction would work. I hate Buffalo Grove cause it sucks compared to all the downtown's around us! We are pathetic excuse for a town! Have any of you guys been to palatines downtown? We are way behind the ball people BG is stuck in the 80's. It is called an investment people... think about future..... and if you want people to even consider moving to this lame excuse for a town its a must.

Reply
Comment_arrow

chuck posniak

3:50 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Tim. It really is way too soon to be pro or con for something that is in the concept phase, but I agree that we need a real downtown and Town Center is way to small for that purpose. The golf course doesn't pay for itsself and is costing all BG tax payers money. I don't play golf and would like a tax rebate.

Let's wait and see the full extent of the proposal before we get all hot and bothered by a concept that has less than a 50% chance of going very far.

Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

9:41 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Chuck,
You are incredibly naive if you think your taxes are going to go down or you are going to get a "rebate."
Not withstanding the possible its possible merits, the potential pitfalls are much larger. What really drives me up the wall is the lack of any concern about the very large potential for failure , as we witness the total failure of Town Center, large numbers of empty storefronts and the total failure of the Village to develop prime retail space along Milwaukee Road, is that the total absence of concern by the trustees.
There is a very large potential for failure with tax payers left holding the bag. It was the former Board of Trustees that sold the disaster that is the town Center and they have done nothing, NOTHING, to demonstrate/exhibit/show why this latest developer's concept --and that is all it is -- has any potential to succeed.
There is, and was, plenty of space in the current town center to serve as a core area (by the way, define "downtown') for BG. It probably takes less imagination, and less risk, to the tax payers to conceptualize it. You would have to think that the current developers of that property would be open to it. Unfortunately, the Board seems to have written off their last attempt at suburban planning.

Jilly

11:22 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I would like to stay civil about this, not call you crazy and just mention that if you don't like BG why don't you move to a more desirable location that suits your needs? Just saying.

Reply

Diane

11:50 am on Sunday, October 28, 2012

As Angie said, Palatine, Arlington Heights and Des Plaines are all built around a Metra station. It has to be viable and this proposal isn't. I'm sure we'd end up with the bill eventually, as usual. Also, I moved to BG for the country atmosphere in a semi-urban environment. If I wanted a city ambience, I'd move to Chicago. I don't want that; I like it here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy Klein

12:21 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

And Park Ridge, Libertyville, Deerfield, etc!

Comment_arrow

Danette Hayes

1:41 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I think Diane and Tim have valid points. Our property taxes are high because we're not Vernon Hills or Lincolnshire or Deer Park. Our taxes aren't coming down if we don't bring revenue from other sources other than our homes, into Buffalo Grove. I do agree that focusing on the metra would be something worth rallying around. However if we don't have weekend service like Deefield etc - what's the point. On another issue, why jump all over the guy who stated the truth and his opinion that BG sucks when it comes to downtown. He doesn't have to move - we all MOVE here for the school system. That's no longer a viable or sustainable investment for a lot of people so bringing in a retail and successful commerce isn't necessarily a judgment or negative ding, it's a smart approach to the future for Buffalo Grove. It's ridiculous how many people jump at the opportunity to say "if you don't like it leave"... careful what you wish for. Our population continues to decline and as it does our property taxes don't decline, they increase.

Comment_arrow

chuck posniak

3:55 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I'm not sure about the chicken or the egg, but the Metra Stations for the most part came AFTER the downtowns.

Comment_arrow

Diane

10:49 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

Chuck, the metra stations have been in Arlington Hts, Palatine, Des Plaines, etc. for as long as I've lived out here which is most of my long life. They moved the Palatine station a couple blocks, but that's the only change. The Buffalo Grove station is relatively new as there wasn't passenger service until the last 10 years or so.

Teresa Caldwell

12:01 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

They really should concentrate on fixing up all the existing strip malls before adding more. I do not look forward to more traffic and don't look forward to having to pay for it as a taxpayer. If they do this (which I am pretty sure they will), I hope they do it on a smaller scale. Seems overboard to me.

Reply

Jilly

12:30 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

It certainly seems that most are not in favor of this project. I hope the board is reading all of this and taking note.

Reply

Danette Hayes

1:43 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Jilly - I think the board has already made up its mind unfortunately. I'll probably have moved on by the time it comes to fruition (empty nest) but sadly your point about the Metra should've been a first discovery for our board as well as the developer. It wasn't and I don't see them changing course now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jilly

2:00 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Danette- I didn't make the comment about the metra site someone else did. Also, I didn't jump on that guy but asked him to be civil. We are not crazy, just stating our opinions of which I welcome hearing from others as well as being able to voice my own. It appeared to me that he was very unhappy living here and so I thought I'd suggest he'd move to a more desirable location. He just sounded so angry. As far as the pros and cons for this project, if we all state our opinions, go back and forth and then take a vote the board should honor what the residents have decided. I'm just hoping that plans can NOT legally go forward without the approval of all of us.

BG Park District Patron

2:05 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Susan and Audrey, as I understand it (not 100% sure), the Town Center is privately owned so re vamping it would be up to the owner. That is out of the Villages hands.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danette Hayes

2:50 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Surely the brilliance of our village board can somehow use the wacky zoning issues we have and force the issue. There's not enough creative thought coming out of the board - this is a prime example. If zoning and development can't force the owner into making the Town Center more lucrative for more than his own interests, then use existing space to make him less competitive - hit him in his own pocket. When there's nothing operating in the town center because we've utilized existing space more creatively...he'll fold. If the BG Theater closes, outside of Benny's and Pizza - what will be the main draw? The Town Center has been less than desirable for over a decade. Surely in all that time the village has entertained "what could've been" if the current owner wasn't such a kurmudgeon. I can't believe a developer would tie its name to the Town Center. Either way - something has to be done to bring revenue into the community.

Comment_arrow

Buffalo Grove Theater

5:37 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

It was the village that changed the original plans for the TownCenter when it was being developed the first time cause of the traffic patterns. The New Downtown would be a nightmare for many reasons. BG needs to support the businesses that are already opened before trying to or wondering why no other companies want to be here. People come to my business and half the time they say they didn't know we were here. SAD

BG Park District Patron

2:11 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

On that note, I do not understand why we are suddenly so desperate for revenue when we could have had the Target Center and the Walmart/Sams club. Those were slotted for Buffalo Grove but we did not want it. So after major hoops jumped, both those plots of land were annexed to Wheeling. Now they receive all that revenue. Seems a little backwards, don't you think?

Reply
Comment_arrow

BG Mom

4:44 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Wasn't that the same story with City Park in Lincolnshire?

Sandy Klein

2:34 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Charlie, you're right and it certainly seems like there's an agenda. They have nothing to say to the experts who have no real financial interest in what we do but to the guy who stands to make some nice money out of it, they're just drooling over every word he says. That alone makes me wonder how much trust we should put in this board.

Danette, our property taxes are high because of the school system and nothing is going to reduce our taxes. We've heard for years that once we have businesses established here (back in the '80's when there was much farm land) that our taxes would go down. Has anyone seen that happen? Because I haven't. And I've been here from the days when there were no businesses in town other than the mom and pop; variety through today. Must we become Golf and Meacham in Schaumburg in order to see a reduction in property taxes?

But I agree with you - it almost seems like the board has made their decision. Well, I've made mine, too. I'm not going to vote for any of them again for anything. I don't feel they have our best interests in mind, they only want to leave some legacy. Well look at the legacy left by the bozo's who told us town center would be THE thing that gives us a real downtown with lots of things to do for families, many shops and nice restaurants. That's some legacy, isn't it?!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danette Hayes

3:02 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Sandy - I hear you...and I don't think the town center is any legacy to point at and be proud of....it's let the whole village down. I wasn't here in the 80s and I don't want to become Golf and Meacham but the businesses that have been built in BG since the 90s haven't reduced our property taxes because the majority of those businesses weren't sustainable and they've left. Every time we lose stores due to zoning, access etc we're not making up the losses. Now we're faced with half empty strip malls. So I agree with your point to the extent that increased revenue will help in the long term lower our taxes overall - we just haven't seen any success with what's occurred so far. I'm not a fan of our board - I just think they're lazy and instead of refocusing on following through with what has already been created - they just would rather bank on "new and flashy." I'd rather see them engage local developers to see what their ideas for working with existing infrastructure and turning it into something attractive visually as well as economically. That would be a much more impressive "legacy" than the existing idea on the table. Make it a contest - throw it at Art Schools etc who have grad students in architecture etc working with the village to bring something fresh and beautiful into the village. I definitely wouldn't go with one plan and call it a day but as I said, I think our board is lazy.

Danette Hayes

2:42 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Jilly - I wasn't specifically tying any one comment to you except to say I agree with your post that we should attempt to work with what we have, instead of building new. I think Tim is passionate about his viewpoint but I don't consider it angry. A lot of times when people post about what they dislike about BG the first comment is to "move." As I said, people move here for the schools - and we pay very high taxes to support those schools. Civil is always good. I just think that we as a community shouldn't always dismiss people's negative opinions without giving them the same time and attention as those who speak positively about our community. There are many occasions on this very message board during other BG village business that people have been told to "move" if you don't like it. As a community that doesn't bode well for newcomers to feel included in the future plans for their homes and their futures. I feel all the comments here are relevant - particularly in something that does impact us not only in the pocketbook but asthetically and in infrastructure as well. I hope you didn't take my comment as personal - it was in general.

Reply

Diane

4:17 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

As far as the golf course not paying for itself, I suspect it's not a lot of money and much better to have the open space than more concrete. Consider it another park. Say yes to grass.

Reply

Buffalo Bill

4:40 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

Isn't the golf course the emergency storm run-off? When it rains a ton and the course gets flooded, where will that water go now?

Reply

Paul Killick

5:03 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

I lived in Novi, Mich. Novi wanted a Town Center to compete with Northville Mich (neighboring town). So they built this shopping center, lined the streets with park benches, planted tree...what happened...people drove there jumped out of their cars shopped and left, traffic in and out became huge issue (city raised more money to widen roads). No many years later, they have ripped out benches (they went unused), it's full of specialty stores (for the most part), they had to anchor it with a Wal-Mart to keep the small stores alive...

BG is not a Palatine, "if we build it they may not come"...

http://novitowncenter.com/store-directory/view-all-stores/

Reply

Amy R

9:42 pm on Sunday, October 28, 2012

agree with Tim completely we need a downtown! we have nothing here no good stores to go to!! Town Center is Just a stupid strip mall with nothing in it! A real downtown should have been built a long time ago so we could have all enjoyed it by the time its finished most of us might be living somewhere else I guess it better late than not at all!

Reply

Xander Crews

12:29 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

Waste of time, what is the goal? build some more empty stores? Not far from Long Grove, also a ghost town. Of course, it would provide jobs.

You don't 'build a downtown'. BG will never be an Arlington Hts type town. That's not a bad thing, just a different thing. What sort of business are we hoping to attract that isn't in the next five towns over. Will they need 53 to be done first, traffic around here already blows.

Reply

James Ehlen

8:41 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

So the thinking here is "Build it and they will come". Who exactly is they? All the towns I k ow that have a viable downtown are on a metra line. Someone in this thread mentioned Libertyville as an example. Um, have you been there? Traffic is horrific even in the middle of the day.

Also, the towns that have a viable downtown grew up around it, they drop it in on top of a golf course.

I'm against this for the following reasons:
- This will have a negative effect on traffic flow in our town, which STINKS as it is
- We already have empty store fronts all over town, this will exasurbate the problem
- Town Center is already a blight on our community, this will make it worse
- This will cause an increase in taxes when it fails
- Property values will take another hit they can't afford, people buying will not see this as a positive
- Loss of green space. Wanna build something? Build a REAL POOL
This is NOT a good idea....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy Klein

5:30 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

Um, I'm the one who mentioned it as an example of successful downtowns that are within walking distance of a metra station. So WHAT is your point in asking me a question about traffic???? Do you read or just pontificate?

Comment_arrow

Sandy Reeves

10:10 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Geez. Why are you being so mean and insulting SK?

Comment_arrow

Sandy Klein

8:24 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Erica, why not address the snarky poster who posted to me first? I'll answer you by saying I respond to snark with snark and I respond to you with the same disdain that I respond to Lisa Stone. Other than that, I'm quite nice.

Comment_arrow

Sandy Reeves

12:01 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Okay - So which "snarky poster" are you talking about? Don't hate on me and insult me because of Lisa Stone.

Leon Gopon

2:15 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

As usual, opinions are like noses. Everybody has one. But why not learn facts? Buffalo Grove didn't turn down Sam's and Walmart. It was the property owner who decided to go to Wheeling. From what I hear, all Buffalo Grove was offered was the corner piece of land that the Mobil station sits on. A lot of the other stories floating around are in the same category. That's why the Save BG group is working to gather facts and data regarding the proposal and the process being followed by the Village. It costs nothing to join that group.

Reply

chris wright

6:10 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

There are several examples of busy shopping / retail / restaurants not on metra lines including Deer Park, Milwaukee Road in Wheeling, Rt 12 / Rand stretching from Lake Cook to Palatine Rd, Rt 12 & Rt 22 / Half Day, Milwaukee & Rt 22 and Milwaukee & Aptakisic. Even the recently expanded Wheeling WalMart and surrounding stores prove a metra station is not needed to bring shoppers and their tax dollars. Being on a metra line may bring some advantages (though not so much on Sat / Sun when there is nominal commuter traffic). Metra lines are important so that employees can commute into work. Not sure they insure a successful shopping / entertainment district. Need to see the details and facts before forming an opinion.:)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

6:47 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

You pointed out areas that are all close to us so why do we need more shopping? More concrete? Are there any stores you want to shop in that aren't there or Woodfield which is only a 15 minute drive down 53? The reason we have so many empty storefronts is because there are too many stores already. The only time sales tax would make a difference to our tax base is in quantity (like the size of Woodfield) and that critera isn't in this plan. Besides, they'll need a TIF district to build this thing and we wouldn't see any taxes from it for 20 years. You know the Target shopping center on Dundee? The TIF ran out and that's why all those stores are empty.

Ellie

8:17 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

A separate voter REFERENDUM is usually required (by law) when you sell-off a public golf course-"park" for NONPUBLIC USE. Who cares? Not in your "backyard"? Warning: when the village begins a policy of "cannIbalizing" open spaces for "revenue" - that lovely little park near your house will be next! "Nip it in the bud now."

Reply

Soccer Mom

11:48 pm on Monday, October 29, 2012

Diane, go look up what a tif really is. It locks the tax rate, it doesn't mean you don't see any taxes for that period of time. How much revenue is that golf course providing now? I think the point is that we are all driving to Woodfield, deer park, etc. to shop because there isn't anything here. I'm glad our government is looking for ways to keep sales tax revenue here so my property taxes don't go up. I looked at the info on the village's site and I don't understand why anyone wouldn't want this for the town. It looks like quite an improvement to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

10:03 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Soccer Mom.
Do you really think that this concept is going to replace trips to Woodfield, Deer Park, Hawthorne, Randhurst, etc? It isn't designed to by anything like those malls.
Wow, I think you need to review the concept. It has anchored by a food store(I can get to 8 within 5-10 minutes of my house right now), and a live performing arts theater -which coincidently havs been a pet eden for a small element of BG for years even though they have never made a fiscal case for it --
heck if you think the golf course is a tax drain, try an live theater!. You have to be a bit daft to think any major retailer (even if you could one) is going to park another store in the middle of nothing when retailers are decreasing their footprints. Heck, Randhurst which already existed continues to have problems and they have more space, more drive-by traffic and more big retailers already there.

ger

12:09 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Chicago is the "Downtown" for BG, Arlington Heights, Deerfield, Libertyville,
Wheeling, Etc.!!! Also we have several shopping centers that fill our needs.
Plus the Deerfield "Downtown" that this firm touts is a redesigned "Shopping Center"!!

Reply

Cicada

12:14 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Soccar Mom I think you are the one who needs to look up what a TIF is. Start by reading the excellent series done by the Chicago Reader. A TIF freezes the property taxes over a timeframe that go to schools, parks, etc and ultimately causes taxes to rise since the money will be diverted to this development that many feel there is no need for instead of other things.

Reply

Ellen Kelly

8:25 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

We do not need a downtown or town center. People are attracted to Buffalo Grove because of its schools and location. Green space is better than concrete any day.
Ellen KElly

Reply

Grand High Exhalted Mystic Ruler over all Racoondom

9:01 am on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

"They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot
With a pink hotel, a boutique
And a swinging hot SPOT
Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got
'Til it's gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot"

Reply
Comment_arrow

NotWastingTime

10:55 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

You may wish to attribute this to the songwriter, Joni Mitchell

Tom K

3:41 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

As a former small business owner in Buffalo Grove and a local area resident, I can tell you that there are towns in the Chicago area that are known to be good for business and others that are known to be the opposite, I can tell you that the reputation for Buffalo Grove is that it is most definitely not business friendly, and I can attest to that fact. As many of the other previous posters have noted, Buffalo Grove has been described to me by my realtor (who emphatically tried to discourage me from opening a business here) as "house poor", meaning the recent downturn in the economy has especially hit this community hard because much of their wealth is tied to their homes. Secondly, I can tell you first hand that the village itself is in fact pretty difficult to work with (compared to other local villages I've worked with). So until the Board members can figure out a way to encourage and attract more businesses (I guess the first step would be to acknowledge they even want to promote businesses in Buffalo Grove to begin with) to help pay for a chunk of your tax burden, I'm sad to say that I think its just going to continue to get worse and worse.

Reply

Danette Hayes

5:18 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Tom K very relevant and true comment. For those who've posted that they don't want more business and want more green space - much to Tom's comment, BG will continue to decline in population, home values will not increase as in years past and that green space ya'all keep talking about will begin to look less and less appealing. It takes funds to keep the green spaces looking like the park setting you can't seem to let go of. I'm not in favor necessarily of starting new with tearing down half the BG Golf Course but I do agree that there needs to be renewed interest in beautifying what exists and getting retail business back into the village. Our population declining will eventually hurt the schools...and the higher our taxes go because there is no real revenue coming into the village, the more people will go to Lake Zurich, Libertyville and elsewhere. The village does have a reputation for being difficult to work with, many times our zoning issues have created situations where a business walked after many years (car dealers) or they decided not to sign because of the zoning issues. When businesses are not able to advertise their location with signage (simple example) they're going to move down the street to AH, Palatine, Northbrook etc. The village board is on the verge of a wake up call - now is the time to act.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sandy Klein

8:35 pm on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Danette, I don't think people have posted that they don't want more businesses - we just want the empty storefronts filled before some grandiose scheme to add more potential empty storefronts. And as I keep saying, I'll have an open mind about this in a stable economy, if the plan makes sense with the right location and stores.

As for the value of our homes, many of our homes went up significantly in value with the addition of the metra station, so we all know that was a one off and not something we would see again. Of course the value of my home, anyway, has gone down by a huge amount since the jump due to the economy.

The schools won't be hurt and the population won't decline as long as our schools continue to get the lion's share of our taxes. There will always be people willing to move here so their kids can get a great education. The impact the property taxes have is that neighborhoods turn over quickly in Lake County and you don't see an aging population the way you do in Cook County because few can afford to stay - or are willing to stay and pay these ridiculous property taxes once the kids are gone.

Comment_arrow

Sandy Reeves

9:08 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

OMG Sandy. "The impact the property taxes have is that neighborhoods turn over quickly in Lake County and you don't see an aging population the way you do in Cook County because few can afford to stay" Like I said before so insulting.

Janet Sirabian

9:43 am on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Taxes - your property taxes paid to the Village of Buffalo Grove are LESS than 10% of your total property tax bill.

This project is in the concept stages and by no means a "done deal". There is much to be done before it could be completed. Residents need to look at the entire plan and keep informed and participate in the public hearings that will take place. Many of the concerns and questions mentioned here are addressed on the BG website at www.vbg.org

Target and Sam's/Walmart were never a possibility for Buffalo Grove. The property owner had always been in Wheelilng and wanted to stay in Wheeling and was not turned down by the Village of Buffalo Grove.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debbie Salvesen

9:59 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

Janet- There are MANY people opposing this development for a variety of reasons. It saddens me the village trustees do not seem willing to accept the fierce opposition. It is frustrating to be directed to the village website when those of us who have reviewed the plan there are still strongly opposed to the development and we do not get the sense the trustees are listening to the people. Instead of wasting more time, money and resources on a plan so many are against, it appears the goal of ANYONE from the village who writes a comment is to try to push through this idea no matter what the people are saying. Going to the website was a waste of time for me because it did not address the primary issue here - the citizens of BG DO NOT WANT IT TO GO THROUGH! Village leaders need to listen to the people who elected them into office!

Nita

2:44 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

But...but...but...

They NEED the taxes these upscale stores would generate to pay for the widening of Weiland, a projected HUNDRED MILLION dollar project of which the village will probably need to find at least $10, 000, 000 or more, and that's if our almost bankrupt state can come up with the rest. I believe they have already spent half a million on it and nothing's been done to date.

I agree with others - fix what's broken instead of building new.

And I live near the Metra station and with those huge electricity pylons running right near there I can't imagine a successful retail/downtown location ever going in anywhere near there.

Reply

Danette Hayes

4:03 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Why would BG have to come up with $10M for the Weiland Road expansion? Roads are covered under federal and county budgets...according to what I read BG is only on the hook for $1.5M - of which we've already paid $1.2M. It's part of the Lake-Cook expansion - estimated at $54M and $40M for the Weiland Road expansion. Sooooo here's my question - out of all the above posts with some complaining about the traffic - why wouldn't we want the expansion to occur? Lake-Cook Road is traveled by folks from Algonquin to Chicago....fact. The traffic isn't going to decline just because we don't improve the roads OR don't build a profitable retail business. It's going to increase because the surrounding areas are growing and Lake-Cook is a major thruway. As for Weiland - it's how local traffic is able to go around Lake-Cook. Is it inconvenient to have road construction - absolutely. Most of us suffered through Lake Cook Rd when they made it into the 8 or 6 lane thruway it is now but guess what - it didn't last forever and access is much more amenable today than it was 15 years ago. Isn't there a hearing in January? If you don't understand the cost or the why to this improvement, maybe you should attend the hearing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debbie Salvesen

10:09 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

The problem is BG citizens will be forced to pay for expansions to both Lake Cook and Weiland Roads to help people from OTHER towns "PASS THROUGH" our village to get to their destinations faster. I have been to MANY meetings about the expansions and until recently the cost to BG was $20 million (after the state pays, etc.)! The expansion of the roads will also result in people losing their homes, school and park district losing land, businesses having to close, etc. When expansion is talked about, one must look at the whole plan despite what the village , IDOT, etc say. BG Rd is going to be expanded. If the other two roads are also expanded, our town will only get smaller. Adversly affecting the lives of current school children, homeowners, and business owners is not the right choice.

Debbie Salvesen

6:31 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I have attended the majority of the meetings involving the road improvements and the proposed downtown development. While traffic will continue to pass through our village to get to their final destinations, we don't need to pay for an easier access for them when such expansions will cause Buffalo Grove residents, businesses, schools, etc to either lose their homes, drastically affect their ability to be prosperous, and will adversely affect our children's welfare. Both road expansions, Lake Cook Road and Weiland Road, are designed in such a way to force people to lose their homes. Both will affect our children's schools (AJHS and Saint Mary's) and playing fields (both sides of Lake Cook Road). Businesses and residents will also be forced to lose their businesses or homes because of the Weiland Road expansion. I am opposed to both expansions and the downtown development!

Reply

LiLSuzQ32

6:47 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Just three words:

NO

EFFEN

WAY !!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Debbie Salvesen

10:58 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Who are you replying to and what is meant by your comment?

Comment_arrow

LiLSuzQ32

11:02 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I am not replying to anyone, just stating my opinion about the so-called "improvement" of BG ... No EFFEN Way would I support this awful concept !!! In polite society, I have to say "effen" ... in less polite verbiage, the word would end with the letters ucking.

Debbie Salvesen

6:49 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

I am vehemently opposed to spending money which will hurt our citizens, especially our children, just to become known as a "Pass Through Village". I also don't believe the downtown development is in the best interests of our community for too many reasons to list here.

Reply

Soccer Mom

7:26 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Cicada, a tif takes the tax increment and pays back the debt. It doesn't mean no taxes are collected or that local governments don't collect any taxes. We're talking about a piece of land that collects no property tax currently, so what could we possibly lose in property taxes from this?

Charlie Barker, go look at the plan. A grocery store is not the anchor. There is a department store as an anchor and a whole bunch of bars and restaurants. I don't think it's going to replace anything. I think it will give BG people an opportunity to spend money in BG on things that they have historically bought at place like Deer Park and Woodfield.

It seems like there is still a lot of unanswered questions about this downtown that the village is figuring out. I don't quite understand why people are so against something that is conceptual and doesn't have a lot of detail to it yet. I like the idea and I hope it comes to be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

10:25 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Soccer Mom,
What department store? What department store is going to locate in this location and hope to get traffic like it gets at any of the so called regional malls at Randhurst, Deer Park, Woodfield, Hawthorne, or Northbrook Court? All of these have much much stronger traffic and much easy access to a wide variety of areas.
btw, The food store idea was mentioned in initial presentation as one possible use. As for restaurants, give me a break. Beyond the local favorites like The Buffalo, the Continental, Outback and Winberie(which area already right there), there is little demand for more of them especially with the lack of business lunch traffic much needed. What kind of restaurants are you naive to think are going to find this location attractive?
I think you are incredibly naive if you think this particular location is well suited for long term retail viability. Town Center I is much better suited for that and outside of some fine fast food locations, the most successful long term resident is a 2nd class movie theater (pick your seats carefully to find a decent one), a fine bowling alley that has tried to hang on but is now selling and Bumpers which is great if you like pool. Hey, be my guest but you are looking for needles in a haystack if you think this location has any long term viability as a retail location. On top of all, I have little confidence that the current Board has any clue about suburban planning. They have done little right thus far.

RELENTLESSCRITIC

10:51 pm on Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Charlie, you seem to be an expert in retail and urban planning. Maybe you should reach out to the developer to help him plan this thing, because he's obviously just going to build it and then pray he can fill all that empty space once it is done.

I'm sure he just woke up one day and decided to propose this multimillion dollar development without doing any economic studies, or testing the waters with potential tenants to see if there's interest. After all, he'd never dream of getting any tenant contracts in place before breaking ground, would he? The guy is apparently incapable of planning a project like this, despite his success building similar things in other places. He really needs your wisdom and guidance so he doesn't waste his money.

And when you're done, run for a spot on the board so you can share your expertise and educate them on urban planning and retail development because they're just making decisions willy-nilly without doing any research or employing experts in this area. That's how BG turned into a low rent hell hole, right? Just look at how terrible our quality of life is, and how lousy our public works, police and fire departments are performing. And BG is in such terrible financial shape, isn't it? Yep, BG is run by incompetent nincompoops who need more guidance from " experts" like you.

I'm certain you'll fix everything that's less than perfect overnight- probably without leaving your LazyBoy.

Reply

Soccer Mom

7:38 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Charlie, you obviously haven't gone on the village's site. If you had, you'd see that there is a department store planned. It doesn't say what department store, but it also doesn't specify any specific stores or restaurants.

As for your point about lunch business being key, two things... 1. There is an entire office complex around the golf course that I don't think is going anywhere. 2. Your own example of Outback Steakhouse does not open for lunch and somehow they stay in business. I think you are wrong that Town Center is a better location. It is smaller, poorly designed and faces the less busier road.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

9:36 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I've seen the concept. You refuse to comprehend that there is little to indicate why another retail development will succeed in this location when town center, surrounded on three sides by major roads is such a monumental failure. There is absolutely nothing special about this new location and the traffic flow necessary to make it a success will simply drive right on by like it has during the entire history of town center. You are beyond naive(I'll spare you the word) if you think BG folks alone have enough heft to make it work. That is making the same dumb assumption the trustees made on the current town center. They really ought to focus on making the current location work--and it can-- by redeveloping it with the same energy and far less money far far less risk to the tax payers of buffalo grove as they are putting into this current fanciful folly. All I have to read from you comments to demonstrate how out of tune you are is the notion that folks are going to come to this new place to get things that they currently get from the regional malls. That shows me that you haven't read the plan and/or are silly enough to see it in the same light at wood field, rand hurst, deer park, or Hawthorne. And while the trustees ogle their latest dream, highly prime property that would help our tax structure goes completely undeveloped and BG gets usurp by surrounding communities.

Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

11:21 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Soccer Mom.
By the way, "what department store" was rhetorical.
What department store do you think is going to come? What department store do you think can serve as an anchor? What 1 ( because that is all there is room for) department store is going to keep you and all the others from going to the regional malls? Those are some of the very basic questions that need to be answered before any more time or money is spent on this folly. Unless you are one of the fools who think the "if we build, they will come" nonsense. They didn't come to town center and it wasn't the design.
Town Center needs to be razed and re-designed. It is almost as if the Board is completely ignoring this option. With the exception of the new owner of the Eskape site, the rest of it could be easily re-structured and serve the needs of the community incorporating some of the nice thoughts packaged in the new concept. With the Park District moving in across the street for performing arts, the whole area could be rebuilt with the proper structure and same aims (w/o course the new municipal buildings the board would get --gee what a coincidence) on much better and more visible property without the need to "invest" literally millions of dollars in figuring out where to send our rain water.

BG Mom

7:47 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Soccer Mom, Then what do we do with the eyesore that is Town Center? If it had been built in a different manner, NOT like a strip mall, it may have made it. I say knock it down and rework the space. If the village had not been so picky when it was designed and built, it may have made it. They did not even want a Gap store there years ago. That is a huge draw for people of every age. There were many more retailers they turned away. Not "upscale" enough. But at one point we had an Eagle in there. Hmmm...

Reply

Soccer Mom

8:33 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

BG Mom, I don't know what you can do with Town Center, other than buy it and do whatever you'd like with it. I just don't see what Town Center has to do with this downtown proposal.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

8:57 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Other than being a good example of what would be the "Downtown" in 10-20 years, it's irrelevant. The same board members touting this downtown project said Town Center was going to be the answer. Now they say it's private property and they can't do anything about it, so they want to build something else and pour concrete over one of the few green areas left in BG. Then, when we have water in our basements and flooded streets, they're gonna have another excuse.

Halicia Diccino

10:20 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Why do people keep talking about fixing up Towncenter? For the last time-the village DOES NOT OWN IT.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Diane

10:50 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

They aren't going to own this either. And that's the excuse they'll use when this development becomes an empty shell. What we're trying to say is don't build another dinosaur. We already have enough empty storefronts.

Comment_arrow

BG Park District Patron

11:15 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Totally agree Halicia! Drop the Towncenter idea! Everyone is harping about that and the traffic. If, in someother reality, they fixed that up. How would that fix the traffic situation? The Towncenter is a few blocks down from the proposed "downtown". As for the golf course being one of the few green spaces left?? HA! Obviously, you do not utilize any of our parks! Did you know BG has more parks that most suburbs in the NW suburbs? I haven't decided whether I like or dislike this new downtown idea, but drop the Towncenter, it's a non issue and we have more green space that most know or care to find out about!

Comment_arrow

Charlie Barker

11:28 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Halicia,
Gee, do you think the current owners of the town center property would be open to redeveloping it? It is such a clusterf#$@, it is hard to believe that they wouldn't be open to fixing it.

Diane

10:53 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Don't build anything. We don't need any more concrete anywhere in this village. BTW, for you new arrivals, those buildings that the public works and police department are in are fairly new. We paid for those not too long ago. They'd have to go, too.

Reply

Diane

11:31 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

The green areas are important for water. If your basement has never been flooded, you're lucky. More concrete exacerbates the flood problem.

Reply

Soccer Mom

11:32 am on Thursday, November 1, 2012

Diane, you say the same board members are touting this that said town center was going to be the answer. I don't believe that any of the current board members where on the board back then.

Reply

Sandy Klein

6:58 pm on Thursday, November 1, 2012

I found this interesting article in the Lake Zurich Patch about their downtown. According to a consultant they hired, the approach to take isn't to just listen to one developer who asks to make a pitch about what they can do, it's to ask developers to send in their credentials and references, sift through and whittle them down to three developers you invite to send in proposals and proof of financial ability to take on the project.

The consultant also had this to say:

"Brown told the board that there is no market for retail currently. He said the development of Block A should be dictated by what is economically feasible in the marketplace.

“Doesn’t that kill the idea of a destination if it’s nothing but apartments,” asked Poynton.

“You can’t beat the market,” Brown said. He added that the population density doesn’t support retail development for downtown, unless the village was willing to subsidize it.

Brown told board members that he believes the community would be more interested in seeing progress downtown.

“They want a rational approach to downtown,” he said."

http://lakezurich.patch.com/articles/downtown-development-village-looks-at-starting-over-with-new-process

Reply

Rod Crandall

5:45 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

Fix the original "town center" first.

Don't waste anymore of the developers time and money and can this idea now. I, for one, do not want this monstrosity.

If this thing becomes a sucessful reality, which I doubt, it would only worsen the traffic on Lake cook road.

Reply

Debbie Salvesen

10:28 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

To BG Park District patron:
There are many beautiful parks within BG. When my children were young we visited many of them. One issue with some of the parks is that they were built as "neighborhood parks" instead of village ones because parking was NOT included in the building of them. They are not easily accessible to those of us who don't live in those neighborhoods. When there is a really hard or extended rain, the golf course partially floods as it provides extra greenspace for the excess water to go. The golf course could be turned into an actual "Village Green" unlike the current one which has NO immediate parking attached to it. The village citizens who live around the golf course need it to stay green because of the flooding issues. If you think there isn't a flooding problem in BG, then talk to the citizens who live near the creeks, lakes, and water rentention ponds after a big rainstorm.

Reply

Debbie Salvesen

10:59 am on Saturday, December 15, 2012

Whether or not the "Town Center" can be fixed to create the downtown as it was meant to be, may not be part of the solution to the problems of the proposed development and the proposed expansions of LakeCook, Wieland, Aptakistic, and BG Rds. Theorectically let's take it out of the equation. The facts still remain why the development and road extensions need to be reviewed as one because they will have a significant impact on the CURRENT homeowners, business owners, schoolchildren, and even the veterans. Picture in your minds what Lake Cook Rd will do to the exisitng townhomes, football fields, businesses, etc. when it is widened to SIX LANES instead of the current four. Where are they going to get the land needed between the new veterans memorial and AJHS on Weiland to expand to FOUR lanes plus sidewalks and possibly a bike path? When the Park District Buddy Baseball park was built on Aptakistic Rd, adequate parking space was not included despite what the official plans indicated. Recently I read about the citizens who would be affected by the Aptaktic changes wanting a stoplight at Brandywyn. They were told they would not get one unless the expansions went through despite parents repeatedly voicing their concerns over their children's safety when crossing the street. Leaders need to listen to what the citizens are saying instead of just looking at blueprints and IDOT regulations. Numbers are fine on paper, but they don't meet the needs of the people. Leaders: TIME TO LISTEN!

Reply

Leave a comment